From: Bret T. <bt...@gb...> - 2002-08-21 18:29:27
|
On Wed, 2002-08-21 at 05:40, Michel D=E4nzer wrote: > On Wed, 2002-08-21 at 06:28, Bret Towe wrote:=20 > > On Tue, 2002-08-20 at 17:01, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > > > > >=20 > > > > > im using links cause i don't like the way that gentoo does the he= aders > > > > > (it installs a seperate package so i have double the space taken = for the > > > > > same thing) > > > >=20 > > > > Unfortunately, this doesn't work, as you've found out the hard way. > > > >=20 > > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > glibc takes a snapshot of the kernel headers at build time. > > >=20 > > > If he rebuilt glibc, and hasn't gone to a kernel with radically=20 > > > different headers, then it works. >=20 > I brought this up because someone on the Xpert list got bitten by this wi= thin > the 2.4 series of kernels a while ago. >=20 > > > Although Alan noted that it might be a C ABI problem... I'm not > > > quite sure. It definately needs more investigating, especially with > > > distros moving to 3.2. > > >=20 > > > c. > > >=20 > >=20 > > well i rebuilt x and kernel modules since i just upgraded glibc on > > gentoo today to see if that was the problem > > that way it would have the same kernel headers if it wasn't before > >=20 > > and it still crashs :\ > > ill prob play around some more and see if i can find out something else > > but i doubt i will >=20 > Someone else on Xpert reports segfaults with gcc 3.x unless he doesn't > use any optimization flags for the build. Something more to try. :) =20 w00t removing the -O2 flag from host.def seems to let it work now i can finally play some ut at a descent frame rate and the 1283.000 FPS i get in glxgears is so much better compaired to 500 some via software rendering ;) > --=20 > Earthling Michel D=E4nzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) develope= r > XFree86 and DRI project member / CS student, Free Software enthusiast >=20 |