Re: [Dri-devel] radeon drivers (tcl vs. non-tcl)

[Dieter <Die...@ha...>]

On Saturday 22 June 2002 16:15, Jens Owen wrote:
> Zilvinas,
>
> Thanks for posting this data.  It's nice to see confirmation of how
> things were intended to work.

I'll second that.
May I ask if Zilvinas could repeat with 60Hz?
I know that this is a "bad number" but the RAMDAC clock has some influence.
Most "official" benchmarks (Win) are made @60 Hz...

Second:
My dual Athlon MP 1900+ (MSI K7D Master-L, AMD 760MPX) with 512MB DDR-SDRAM (1 
GB is comming soon) is up and running.

I can get my hands on a Radeon 8500 and maybe a 7500, tomorrow or Monday.
I'll do some viewperf-6.1.2 numbers on my V5 5500 @24 bit tonight.

Mesa/demos> ./gloss
596 frames in 5.006 seconds = 119.057 FPS <-- cylinder
764 frames in 5.003 seconds = 152.708 FPS
760 frames in 5.006 seconds = 151.818 FPS
758 frames in 5.001 seconds = 151.57 FPS

483 frames in 5.004 seconds = 96.5228 FPS
420 frames in 5.003 seconds = 83.9496 FPS
420 frames in 5 seconds = 84 FPS
421 frames in 5.008 seconds = 84.0655 FPS <-- teapot

ipers is running @20-22 fps (~580.000 Poly/sec)

Desktop resolution is 1280x1024@24 as always ;-)

We need the Mesa (p)thread stuff badly 'cause all numbers are from single 
theard/process mode (the second CPU was all the time 100% idle).

Cheers,
	Dieter

-- 
Dieter Nützel
Graduate Student, Computer Science

University of Hamburg
Department of Computer Science
@home: Die...@ha...