From: Alexander S. <Ale...@at...> - 2002-06-11 14:36:56
|
> Seriously, the DRI stuff does live in seperate directories,=20 > with the sole=20 > exception of the 2D driver, many of which have different=20 > maintainers in=20 > the XFree86 project scope. So there is a strong physical=20 > seperation of the=20 > DRI code in the XFree86 tree. So, more than the time that=20 > takes to merge=20 > trees, it would be the sinergy of both projects. (My=20 > primarily concern is=20 > that the lack of manpower and tight policies of the XFree86=20 > project would=20 > drag us down instead of boosting). >=20 > Jos=E9 Fonseca A merge would pull the plug from that constantly growing fork problem. Having two CVS repository is much different from having one repository with a mainline tree and a crowd of patches against it. A branch and much more a separate CVS does have the habit to develop much on his own unless you go the two-side pain (plus the one that does have the task of merging) of permanently syncing=20 them. Regards Alex. PS: Why not merge all that stuff in BitKeeper or alikes? I dont want to say CVS is outdated, but maybe it can have some advantages if such a merge happens on a new platform. PS2: sorry if my comments are outdated to that respect... |