From: John J T. <og...@si...> - 2002-01-22 23:48:21
|
On Tue, 2002-01-22 at 15:01, dri...@li... wrote: > Message: 4 > From: Steve Bergman <st...@ru...> > To: dri...@li... > Cc: st...@ru... > Date: 22 Jan 2002 15:01:48 -0600 > Subject: [Dri-devel] Athlon/Kt133/Radeon QD system locking with > 1GB ram > > > --=-psWt2b0/HpBiNwtLjt73 > Content-Type: text/plain > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > Hi, > > I have posted this problem to dri-users a couple of times in the past > and to LKML as well (could be a DRM issue, I guess.) > > I have unfortunately found no solution. > > Basic info: > > Athlon 1200 > KT133 chipset (Epox KT7A2 MB?) > 1.5GB PC133 SDR > Radeon QD 64MB DDR > > Kernel 2.4.17/2.4.8-mdk/2,4,17mjc1/others > XFree86 4.1 amd 4.1.99.6 > > The system works just fine using DRI with anything up to 1GB ram > physically installed. Works well wheter the kernel is compiled with or > without highmem support. > > If I add memory beyond 1024MB (I've tried 1152MB and 1536MB) my 2D > desktop becomes somewhat unstable and *any* use of DRI freezes the > system immediately. (Sometimes I can ping it, sometimes not.) > > Reducing the AGP aperture size in the BIOS seems to help a little. I > have actually gotten a single frame to draw when going into Quake3 > before the system locks. > > It makes no difference whether the kernel is compiled with or without > highmem support. What is important is the physical presence of the > extra memory in the machine. > > I'm attaching output from dmesg, lspci, and the Xfree86 log. > > I have tried with both XF86 4.1 and 4.1.99.6 (from Mandrake Cooker) > although I have not tried 4.2 yet. If anyone has any ideas, I have no > problem getting the 4.2 source and recompiling with any patches. > > If anyone wants any more info, just ask. > > All memory has been extensively tested with memtest86. > > Also, I have been thinking of this as a DRI problem, but just had a very > simple X session with nothing fancy, not even a window manager, segfault > without having done any 3D at all. Is there perhaps a better forum for > my problem? > > The only thing I notice in the XFree86 log that seems like a possibility > is the location of the SAREA which is mapped to just above 1GB. Is that > significant? > > > > I have not received confirmation of my subscription to dri-devel so a cc > would be greatly appreciated as would any help. > > > Thanks for any assistance, > Steve Bergman If you have windows installed on your system, is windows stable when it runs with this much ram? I have heard reports of some boards being unstable with all the memory slots occupied. Just a thought. -- John Tobin og...@si...; AOL IM: ogre7929 http://ogre.rocky-road.net http://ogre.rocky-road.net/cdr.shtml |