From: Frank C. E. <fe...@ai...> - 2001-07-14 21:05:47
|
On Saturday 14 July 2001 09:47, David Dawes wrote: > The docs that XFree86 has from vendors and others for use by its > developers are in most cases provided to us for uses solely and > directly related to XFree86 development. Membership requests that > are related to getting access to the docs for use with work on some > other project are refused for that reason. XFree86 developer > membership is not intended as an access point for restricted vendor > documentation. It's intended for active XFree86 developers. If > you need access to such documentation to do XFree86 development > work, and make some committment to submit work to XFree86 based on > such documentation access within a reasonable period of time, then > the requirement to have a patch submitted and accepted can be waived. Isn't DRI and Mesa support a sub-project of XFree86? If it is not, why are we placing Mesa and DRI code within the source tree of XFree86? -- Frank Earl |