From: Frank W. <fwo...@ho...> - 2000-11-20 06:33:47
|
Here are my two cents ... On Sun, 19 Nov 2000 22:52:40 Nicholas Leippe wrote: > > I think that's a really good point, however, sometimes wrong info > is better than no info, cause it can give a general idea of how things > did go together at one point, and an idea of what to look for even > though some things may have changed, whereas with no info at > all, there isn't even a starting point. (as long as we put the date > on the docs and the version/date of the code it pertains to, this > should be ok imo) That's of course also true. But I think the main problem here is who is going to collect all the info in the first place? I think we should first of all focus on updating the DRI Users Guide. The supported hardware for example seems to be out of date. The Rage 128 Pro, for example, is now supported although the old User's Guide says it isn't. I have already updated this info on the new page. However, what else has changed? What other new known issues are there? Also the CVS info has to be updated. I don't really know how to use CVS but if someone could explain to me how to get the latest branch names and so on I could easily update this. Frank |