From: Roger F. <rf...@rf...> - 2007-04-24 11:18:05
|
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:38:00 +0200 Carlo Traverso <tra...@dm...> wrote: > ... a proposal of having a second test server. > > - having something intermediate between the current test server and > the production server. New big changes, like the WordCheck, could go > live in this server, with real projects and proofreading, to ensure > better tuning of software and procedures. The users might be shared > with the production site, and the projects advertised in the round > pages. A test server with a significant number of real projects would be just what I need to continue my p3 work. I understand why the .net server is sacrosanct, and yet the .org server has insufficient data. The test server is great for working on the site code for managing projects but inadequate for writing code to analyze projects. I see a lot more development down the road for programs that are not interface-related, but are under-the-hood making the site run more efficiently. If I'm right, that's one justification for choosing Carlo's first option. -- Roger Frank <rf...@rf...> |