From: oezbek <oe...@in...> - 2010-05-19 09:24:06
|
----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://saros-build.imp.fu-berlin.de/reviews/r/12/#review15 ----------------------------------------------------------- -1 as the comparison whether a FolderActivity is nested does not take into account that several projects might be involved with similar paths. Additional suggestion: * Move the code to check whether one Activity is nested to another into the FolderActivity, it belongs rather there ./src/de/fu_berlin/inf/dpp/activities/SPathDataObject.java <http://saros-build.imp.fu-berlin.de/reviews/r/12/#comment6> Do not change the API without documenting it. ./src/de/fu_berlin/inf/dpp/net/internal/ActivitySequencer.java <http://saros-build.imp.fu-berlin.de/reviews/r/12/#comment7> The comparison here is not correct, as you only compare the Paths, but not the projects. - oezbek On 2010-05-18 16:01:27.731893, Karl Beecher wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://saros-build.imp.fu-berlin.de/reviews/r/12/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated 2010-05-18 16:01:27.731893) > > > Review request for All Saros. > > > Summary > ------- > > Currently, when you delete a folder with child folders, Saros transmits individual deletion activities for all folders to the peer. > > This is a small optimisation so that recursive folder deletions are folded into a single activity to be sent to the peer. > > > Diffs > ----- > > ./src/de/fu_berlin/inf/dpp/activities/SPathDataObject.java 2163 > ./src/de/fu_berlin/inf/dpp/net/internal/ActivitySequencer.java 2163 > > Diff: http://saros-build.imp.fu-berlin.de/reviews/r/12/diff > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Karl > > |