|
From: Felix W. <fel...@os...> - 2004-04-05 22:59:59
|
Jarno Elonen wrote:
>> I don't understand the semantic role of the
>> line. What does it mean?
>
> It separates two sub-documents (the statement and a differing
> opinion).
What is bad about that? If you have several headings per part, that
would IMO be a valid reason to use a transition at the end of a section.
Heading 1
=========
foo
Heading 2
=========
foo2
-------------------
Heading 3
=========
bar
Heading 4
=========
bar2
Even if the transition is rendered as a vertical gap, it still makes
sense.
>> Such usage would be abuse. It's only an accident that a transition
>> renders as a horizontal rule in HTML. In other output, it may
>> render as a large vertical gap or as three asterisks ("* * *").
What about simply documentating that? I think that it is not a good
idea to detain the user from doing that, if he really needs it.
--
http://www.ososo.de/
|