|
From: Schimon J. <sc...@fe...> - 2025-10-09 07:37:16
|
Thank you for your helpful respond. Schimon On Thu, 9 Oct 2025 07:25:29 -0000 (UTC) Guenter Milde via Docutils-users <doc...@li...> wrote: > On 2025-10-07, Schimon Jehudah via Docutils-users wrote: > > On Tue, 7 Oct 2025 18:41:51 -0000 (UTC) > > Guenter Milde via Docutils-users wrote: > >> On 2025-10-06, Schimon Jehudah via Docutils-users wrote: > >> >> On 2025-09-28, Schimon Jehudah via Docutils-users wrote: > > >> >> > XLink might be helpful for both, Atom and (X)HTML, in order to > >> >> > set accurate links to references. > > >> I don't think using XLink will give advantages to (X)HTML, as > >> browser support is missing. > ... > > > XLink is fine to them, for toying with SVG ... > > Sorry for beeing ambiguous. My response was intended to mean: > > I don't think using XLink will give advantages to > *Docutils (X)HTML writers*, > as it XLink is not part of the various HTML standards > and browser support is missing. > > > > Also, XLink has no format of its own, and it is meant to be > > incorporated into existing formats. > > As docutils.dtd is designed for extensibility, it should be easy > for interested parties to derive a custom document type with, e.g., > a <link> element supporting XLink syntax. > > > Günter > |