From: Guenter M. <mi...@us...> - 2025-10-09 07:25:42
|
On 2025-10-07, Schimon Jehudah via Docutils-users wrote: > On Tue, 7 Oct 2025 18:41:51 -0000 (UTC) > Guenter Milde via Docutils-users wrote: >> On 2025-10-06, Schimon Jehudah via Docutils-users wrote: >> >> On 2025-09-28, Schimon Jehudah via Docutils-users wrote: >> >> > XLink might be helpful for both, Atom and (X)HTML, in order to >> >> > set accurate links to references. >> I don't think using XLink will give advantages to (X)HTML, as browser >> support is missing. ... > XLink is fine to them, for toying with SVG ... Sorry for beeing ambiguous. My response was intended to mean: I don't think using XLink will give advantages to *Docutils (X)HTML writers*, as it XLink is not part of the various HTML standards and browser support is missing. > Also, XLink has no format of its own, and it is meant to be > incorporated into existing formats. As docutils.dtd is designed for extensibility, it should be easy for interested parties to derive a custom document type with, e.g., a <link> element supporting XLink syntax. Günter |