|
From: Bill B. <bb...@co...> - 2002-12-24 16:05:30
|
On Tuesday, Dec 24, 2002, at 08:42 US/Eastern, Benja Fallenstein wrote: > Hiya, > > Bill Bumgarner wrote: > >> I understand that :: basically leads to a literal block, but I don't >> see anything that causes a parsed-literal to be used instead? > IIRC parsed-literal is a directive, so, > > .. parsed-literal:: > <something> > > (where the 'something' is indented, in case my stupid mailer messes > that up again :-( ) Right. Got it. That works great. But it looks ugly-- it is the first intrusive formatting command I have had to include in the documents. Feature request; maybe if a paragraph ends in :;, the following block is a parsed literal as opposed to a literal block? In general, I'm finding that basic docutils usage is straightforward and easy, but there is a HUGE learning curve between basic usage and advanced/competent/complete usage. I.e. it took me quite a bit of experimentation to figure out how to control section levels. This is not a complaint or criticism-- docutils is at 0.2 and is already of a quality to be both useful and approachable (the ROI is good)-- just a comment. (Heck, PyObjC is in its 7th year of development, is at version 0.8, and *still* doesn't have real docs... :-) The generic/simple HTML parser is now actually useful -- i.e. I'm actually using it to write O'Reilly articles in the format they require and it is considerably faster than using Word, less tedious than writing raw HTML, and a heck of a lot more presentable than doing straight unformatted text. b.bum |