|
From: Richard J. <rj...@ek...> - 2002-10-12 01:00:34
|
On Sat, 12 Oct 2002 10:45 am, David Goodger wrote:
> Richard Jones wrote:
> > This seemed like a good idea, hope I haven't overstepped the mark,
> > David.
>
> Using the competition?!? Traitor! How dare you?
>
> ;-)
>
> Sure, it's fine. If it's useful to anyone, I have no objections.
> We're sure to get some good ideas from epydoc (and HappyDoc etc.).
> Eventually, of course, it will be replaced with the One True API
> Docset. ;-)
Or specifically, offer an output mode that _doesn't_ look like the (IMHO) ugly
pydoc/happydoc page structure. Euwww :)
> One nit, though. Could you replace it with a run over the curremt CVS
> code? I recently moved the bibliographic fields that were in all the
> module docstrings into simple comments. This gets rid of ":Author:
> David Goodger :Contact: goodger@users." from the API docs of almost
> EVERY SINGLE MODULE ENTRY! Sheesh! You'd think the guy was conceited
> or something.
Heh - sorry, I hadn't cvs up'ed for a while. Will do this weekend.
Richard
|