Re: [Docutils-develop] Option fields...

[Adam C. <ad...@ch...>]

On Thu, 04 Jul 2002 20:38:41 -0400 David Goodger
<go...@us...> wrote:

[...]

> > I guess I should use definitionlists then, but it would be nicer
> > with "real" option lists. :)
> 
> "Real" option lists are simply two-column lists, and are only possible
> because of the distinctive option prefixes.  You don't have that
> advantage, so you might want to look into alternatives, like the
> existing definition list or table syntax, the proposed simple table
> syntax (see http://docutils.sf.net/spec/rst/problems.html#tables,
> alternatives 3-6), or the proposed "columns" directive (see
> http://docutils.sf.net/spec/notes#body-columns).

Yes, although you loose some semantic information then (the fact that it is a
list of options). Oh well, I guess I'll have to live with that... :)

---
Adam Chodorowski <ad...@ch...>

There are two major products that come from Berkeley: LSD and UNIX.
We don't believe this to be a coincidence.
    -- Jeremy S. Anderson