[Docutils-develop] Parsing oddness

[Richard J. <rj...@ek...>]

I've got some problems in parsing a document. The following biblio element 
results in errors:

>>>>> snip
:Organization: Computer and Information Sciences::

                 New Jersey Institute of Technology
                 University Heights
                 Newark, NJ, 07102
                 (address obsolescent).
<<<<< snip

Reporter: WARNING (2) Literal block expected at line 2; none found.
Reporter: WARNING (2) Cannot extract compound bibliographic field 
"Organization".


I've hit another error in a definition list... note the line number the error 
is reported at, and the line that is actually erroneous (the last one).

>>>>> snip
S.member(ob), D.member(arg,map), G.member(src,dst)
  respectively are membership tests for the types. Each returns 1 if the
  object or pair are members of the structure or 0 otherwise.

S.add(ob), D.add(arg,map), G.add(src,dst)
  respectively add new members to the object. These are equivalent to
  G[src]=dst, D[arg]=map, S[ob]=1 but the former may be preferrable for
  graphs and sets since they are less misleading. This is an "in
  place" mutation operation -- it will raise an error if the object has
  been hashed.

X.items()
  returns a list of the members of the structure. For example::

    >>> X = kjSet([0, 1, 2, 0, 1])
    >>> X.items()
    [1, 0, 2]
    >>> X = kjGraph([(3, 0), (2, 2), (1, 2), (2, 0), (2, 0), (3, 0)])
    >>> X.items()
    [(1, 2), (3, 0), (2, 2), (2, 0)]

G.keys(), G.values()
  return the left members and right members of pairs in the graph G
  respectively. For example::

    >>> G = kjGraph([(4, 8), (0, 9), (1, 10), (4, 9), (3, 7), (3, 8), (2,
    >>> 7)])
    >>> G.keys()
    [4, 0, 1, 3, 2]
    >>> G.values()
    [8, 9, 10, 9, 7, 8, 7]

  Note that keys eliminates redundancies, whereas values does not. These
  functions are also defined for dictionaries but are not defined for
sets.

<<<<< snip

Reporter: WARNING (2) Definition list ends without a blank line; unexpected 
unindent at line 5.



     Richard