[Docutils-users] Re: FW: Another Problem with latex writer

[David A. <da...@bo...>]

eng...@ss... writes:

>> Which in turn is displayed as:
>>
>>     In keeping with our quest for polymorphism, lambda is also a unary
>> metafunction returning a metafunction
>>     class. In other words, we could have written
>>     template <class X>
>>     struct times4
>>     : twice<\textbf{typename mpl::lambda<mpl::plus<_1,_1> >::type}, X>
>>     {};
>>
>> Note the appearance of TeX directives in the output.
>
> because its inside verbatim, julien used obeyspace asf. but this never worked
> for me. i modified it using an mbox with ttfamily, but tt seams to have no
> bold style.
>
> in CVS.
>
>> I'm beginning to wonder about using this toolchain to get from
>> ReST->PDF.  Maybe ReST->DocBook->PDF is a better bet.
>
> sure if you have docbook installed, why not.
>
> i am thinking about not removing the stryle.tex but moving as much as possible
> into it, so it will function like the css.

Sorry, I'm having a hard time understanding anything you're saying
here, but latex just got much worse for our application, since we
have curly braces in our literal blocks.  Lines like this don't work
out too well:

    \mbox{}}


-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com