From: Beni C. <cb...@te...> - 2002-12-11 21:43:03
|
On 2002-12-11, David Ascher wrote: > Beni Cherniavsky wrote: > > > I don't think that skipping errors is the right approach since it can > > guess wrongly what you meant. DWIMs are known to make people sorry for > > using them :-).However the cycle of running docutils and fixing the > > source is not very convenient when you are in a hurry.TeX's approach of > > stopping and suggesting interactive fix possibilities could be more > > effecient (if the messages are less criptic ;-) but doesn't save the > > corrections in any way.So how about a ``--halt=edit`` mode that will > > spawn your text editor on the line where the first error happened and > > after you exit the editor, it will restart from the beginning (or maybe > > continue if the input file's timestamp hasn't changed)? > > None of this helps me, as the docutils phase is run by a cron job at 4 in the > morning.Trust me, I know what I'm doing =). > Oh, now I understand =). But I could use an edit mode in any case, maybe I'll write one. -- Beni Cherniavsky <cb...@tx...> What's lower level than machine code? A spreadsheet: not only addresses are numeric and hand-allocated but also all loops are hand-unrolled and all calls hand-inlined... (and macros are unheard of, of course). |