From: David A. <DavidA@ActiveState.com> - 2002-12-11 17:53:15
|
Beni Cherniavsky wrote: > I don't think that skipping errors is the right approach since it can > guess wrongly what you meant. DWIMs are known to make people sorry for > using them :-). However the cycle of running docutils and fixing the > source is not very convenient when you are in a hurry. TeX's approach of > stopping and suggesting interactive fix possibilities could be more > effecient (if the messages are less criptic ;-) but doesn't save the > corrections in any way. So how about a ``--halt=edit`` mode that will > spawn your text editor on the line where the first error happened and > after you exit the editor, it will restart from the beginning (or maybe > continue if the input file's timestamp hasn't changed)? None of this helps me, as the docutils phase is run by a cron job at 4 in the morning. Trust me, I know what I'm doing =). --david |