From: Mark M. <ma...@mc...> - 2002-10-10 15:47:17
|
Forgive me if this is a FAQ. In StructuredText, you can do: 1. a 1. b 1. c and you'll get an ordered list (<ol><li>a</li><li>b</li><li>c</li>). The advantage of this approach is that I don't need to manage the numbers (e.g., if I move c between a and b, I don't have to "renumber" them). With reStructuredText, OTOH, the above generates three ordered lists: <ol> <li>a</li> </ol> <ol> <li>b</li> </ol> <ol> <li>c</li> </ol> There's probably a good reason for this. I realize this is part of the specification: http://docutils.sourceforge.net/spec/rst/reStructuredText.html#enumerated-li sts Any insight on why the implicit sequence approach is avoided (which seems usable at least in isolation) is greatly appreciated. Perhaps the answer is simply: Explicit is better than implicit. Thanks, // mark - |