From: Günter M. <mi...@us...> - 2023-05-18 08:32:50
|
- **status**: open --> closed-invalid - **Comment**: The OP did not specify unambiguously what the desired behaviour would be and did not follow up for more than 10 years. There has not been other requests for a "parsed-literal" include option. --- **[feature-requests:#29] include directive and parsed literals** **Status:** closed-invalid **Group:** Default **Created:** Fri Aug 31, 2012 06:49 PM UTC by Mike Solomon **Last Updated:** Wed Mar 11, 2015 03:09 PM UTC **Owner:** nobody With Docutils >= 0.9, it is impossible to include HTML files \(without parsing of rst-inline-markup in the HTML file\) with the "include" directive:: .. include:: test.html :code: HTML It would be nice to have a new option for the include directive that allowed one to pass the content of the included file to a "parsed literal" block. Something like: .. include:: test.html :parsed-literal: HTML --- Sent from sourceforge.net because doc...@li... is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/docutils/feature-requests/ To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/docutils/admin/feature-requests/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list. |