From: Adam T. <aat...@ou...> - 2023-04-08 09:50:08
|
Dear Günter, > While I favour keeping "auto_encode" over a seprate `publish_bytes()` > function, I left the decision about the end state of this transition open... A decision to make later, and one that doesn't block the 0.20 release! > This will become easier with type annotations in the source. > (How about starting with annotating "core.py". I only postponed this because > I don't know whether a partially type-hinted module will interfere with the > present 3rd-party type hint stubs.) I have a patch for adding type hints to Docutils, but wanted to wait until releasing Docutils 0.20 so as not to add major new changes to the repository. >> If you have time, perhaps you could commit your patch (or the latest >> version thereof), and we could make progress from there? As far as I >> can tell, the only unresolved point at the moment ahead of releasing >> Docutils 0.20 is the future of ``publish_bytes``. > This is now [r9336]. > A patch removing `publish_bytes` waits in a branch in my local Git repo. I think to un-block the release we should apply the patch removing ``publish_bytes``. Thanks, Adam |