From: Adam T. <aat...@ou...> - 2022-11-16 21:11:11
|
Dear Günter, > the commit r9245 eliminates the deliberate distinction between Python > object names (up to r9244 marked up with the default "title-reference" > role, not *emphasis*!) and filenames or code examples (marked up as > "inline literal"). Thank you for the clarification. I suggest documenting this in a comment at the start of the HISTORY file, as the distinction was entirely lost on me. We might also consider using explicit markup for clarity (either ``:title:``, or a custom code role ``:py:``). For programme names, such as "pandoc", "flake8", and "2to3", what syntax would we use? Following the rule outlined in your note, these would use literal syntax, I believe, though I would like to check before reverting a reversion. There are some Python names that were previously using literal syntax that should likely be modified, e.g. "HTMLTranslator.topic_classes", "use_latex_toc", "split_escaped_whitespace", etc. Finally, for expressions in the HISTORY file (e.g. "parts['title']", "footnote_backlinks==False", etc), what syntax should we use? Thanks, Adam |