From: Guenter M. <mi...@us...> - 2022-06-01 14:42:50
|
Dear Agata, On 2022-05-24, Agathe Porte wrote: >> As discussed in docutils-users, please find attached two patches to >> improve docutils video support. Please let me know when they are >> merged Before the next changes/improvements to Docutils "video" support, I'd like to have a discussion on the goals and means in order to get a sound and stable behaviour. * Do we need dedicated support for video content in Docutils, in reStructuredText? As the only output format that can handle video is HTML5, it may suffice to use ``.. raw:: html`` blocks instead of re-creating a complex interface for the various use cases and user preferences. * How do we want to represent "video" elements and options: - in the document tree (<video> node or <image> node, ...) - in reStructuredText (``.. video::`` or ``.. image`` directive) if ``.. video::`` then also ``vidoe-figure``? * Which "bells and whistles" shall be accessible from reStructuredText? What is appropriate for a "lightwight markup language"? How do we document/teach the feature(s)? >> (I see last revision is from 2021-11-23). This is the last release (0.18.1). The last revision is from 2022-05-30 (cf. https://sourceforge.net/p/docutils/code/HEAD/tree/ When working *on* Docutils, I recommend an `editable install`__ from the repository__. __ https://docutils.sourceforge.io/docs/dev/repository.html#editable-installs __ https://docutils.sourceforge.io/docs/dev/repository.html#checking-out-the-repository Thank you for sharing, Günter |