[Docutils-develop] [docutils:feature-requests] Re: #61 Support for :BCP: role, similar

[Günter M. <mi...@us...>]

After the decision to accept a patch for a new "hardcoded" *BCP* role, I learned about more "PEP/RFC-like" document series (including the idea to use introduce Docutils Enhancement Proposals).
Now, the jury is out whether a "role-builder" would be better than one ... x new pre-defined roles and whether "BCP" should be added to the pre-defined/hard-coded roles.
This is why I would prefer to wait a bit with this addition and concentrate on the other irons in the fire.
Sorry, and thanks for the work. Günter


---

** [feature-requests:#61] Support for :BCP: role, similar**

**Status:** open
**Group:** Default
**Created:** Tue Apr 09, 2019 08:46 AM UTC by Roberto Polli
**Last Updated:** Wed Jan 12, 2022 04:29 PM UTC
**Owner:** nobody


## I wish

- support for referencing IETF Best Current Practices, eg:  :BCP:`47`role 
- the processing is similar to :RFC:

## Notes

- sphinx people suggests that goes in docutils. see  https://github.com/sphinx-doc/sphinx/issues/6255 


---

Sent from sourceforge.net because doc...@li... is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/docutils/feature-requests/

To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/docutils/admin/feature-requests/options.  Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.