Re: [Docutils-develop] [docutils:feature-requests] #86 Replace recommonmark with myst-docutils

[Komiya T. <i.t...@gm...>]

>BTW: what is the state of https://pypi.org/project/pycmark/ by @ tk0miya?
>It looks promising as a lightweight alternative for pure CommonMark

I finished my work. It has been fully compatible with CommonMark.
The remaining task is creating an extension for sphinx using pycmark
and pycmark-gfm.
I thought to release v1.0 after that, but I lost my interest for it
because myst-parser has appeared.

2022年1月6日(木) 23:08 "Günter Milde" via Docutils-develop
<doc...@li...>:
>
> status: open --> open-fixed
> Comment:
>
> Marking this as fixed, will close once the next release is out.
>
> BTW: what is the state of https://pypi.org/project/pycmark/ by @ tk0miya?
> It looks promising as a lightweight alternative for pure CommonMark
> as it only depends on Docutils.
>
> Thank you all for the good work.
>
> ________________________________
>
> [feature-requests:#86] Replace recommonmark with myst-docutils
>
> Status: open-fixed
> Group: Default
> Created: Sun Jan 02, 2022 01:26 PM UTC by Chris Sewell
> Last Updated: Wed Jan 05, 2022 05:58 PM UTC
> Owner: nobody
>
> Hey guys,
>
> As discussed in https://github.com/readthedocs/recommonmark/issues/221, recommonmark has been officially deprecated in favour of https://github.com/executablebooks/MyST-Parser/.
>
> In myst-parser v0.16, I added first-class support for direct docutils use (as opposed to via sphinx) and introduced the parallel https://pypi.org/project/myst-docutils/ distribution, which is myst-parser but without explicit install requirements on docutils or sphinx, i.e. you can install myst-docutils with any version of docutils and it will work without sphinx installed.
>
> receive(see https://github.com/executablebooks/MyST-Parser/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md#0160---2021-12-06, https://github.com/executablebooks/MyST-Parser/issues/347, and https://myst-parser.readthedocs.io/en/latest/docutils.html)
> receive
> receiveIn the master branch (and soon to be myst-docutils v0.17) I have also been working to improve the rigour of the behaviour/testing against this parser.
> (as an example, I believe your current recommonmark solution does not actually work properly with code fences, because it does not syntax highlight the code, see: https://github.com/executablebooks/MyST-Parser/pull/478)
>
> The fixture test sets, essentially provide a full specification of the Markdown -> docutils AST conversion (pre-docutils-transforms):
>
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/executablebooks/MyST-Parser/master/tests/test_renderers/fixtures/docutil_syntax_elements.md
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/executablebooks/MyST-Parser/master/tests/test_renderers/fixtures/docutil_roles.md
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/executablebooks/MyST-Parser/master/tests/test_renderers/fixtures/docutil_directives.md
>
> and are currently tested in the CI for myst-docutils against docutils v0.16, v0.17 and v0.18: https://github.com/executablebooks/MyST-Parser/runs/4670995311?check_suite_focus=true
>
> I'm also happy to recieve any feedback / improvement suggestions to facilitate this, and have opened a parallel discussion topic here: https://github.com/executablebooks/MyST-Parser/discussions/487
>
> Cheer,
> Chris
>
> ________________________________
>
> Sent from sourceforge.net because doc...@li... is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/docutils/feature-requests/
>
> To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/docutils/admin/feature-requests/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Docutils-develop mailing list
> Doc...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/docutils-develop
>
> Please use "Reply All" to reply to the list.