From: Alan I. <ala...@gm...> - 2019-05-16 20:03:51
|
In published work, tables and figures often require explanatory notes. In rst there appears to be an odd difference in structure between tables and figures. A figure is understood to have three possible types of content, and image, a caption, and what is called a "legend" (which can hold explanatory notes). A table does not do this, but it could. Might this be considered as a possible enhancement? Thanks, Alan Isaac |