[Docutils-users] weird footnotes in the generated LaTeX

[Matěj C. <mc...@ce...>]

Hi,

I have written a bit longer document using rST (all discussed 
files are in https://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/tmp/harry_potter/), 
and then convered it to LaTeX just with plain rst2xetex (using 
0.13.1). The resulting file is 
  https://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/tmp/harry_potter/harry-potter-odpoved-brachovi.pdf
and the problem I have it is that footnotes are quite often not 
on the page they referred to (see page 8 for an example). When 
I just hand-edited the LaTeX file and replaced all 
\DUfootnotetext & \DUfootnotemark constructs with plain 
\footnote and suddenly all footnotes are placed correctly (as 
expected from LaTeX; the file 
harry-potter-odpoved-brachovi-hand_edited.pdf).

Is there some configuration or something which would persuade 
docutils not to mess with footenotes and use plain \footnote{} 
in LaTeX?

Thank you,

Matěj

-- 
https://matej.ceplovi.cz/blog/, Jabber: mc...@ce...
GPG Finger: 3C76 A027 CA45 AD70 98B5  BC1D 7920 5802 880B C9D8
 
"Anything essential is invisible to the eyes", the little prince
repeated, in order to remember.
"It's the time you spent on your rose that makes your rose so
important."
"It's the time I spent on my rose ...," the little prince
repeated, in order to remember.
"People have forgotten this truth." the fox said. "But you
mustn't forget it.  You become responsible forever for what
you've tamed. You're responsible for your rose..."
"I'm responsible for my rose...," the little prince repeated, in
order to remember.
    -- Antoine de Saint-Exupéry: The Little Prince