... maybe
docutils was command line tools : rst2something
but is also used as a library ... so it might not be rst2man, maybe a sphinx pipeline
but how do i know this
but you are correct , this would be interesting
---
**[bugs:#480] manpage: would like more informative document comments**
**Status:** open
**Created:** Wed Mar 27, 2024 01:07 AM UTC by G. Branden Robinson
**Last Updated:** Wed Mar 27, 2024 01:07 AM UTC
**Owner:** nobody
*man* documents generated by *rst2man* have some indication that they were automatically generated but I would prefer to see more information along these lines.
Here's the status quo.
~~~
.\" Man page generated from reStructuredText.
.\" body of man page follows
.\" Generated by docutils manpage writer.
.
~~~
In my opinion, the comments should be coalesced at the top of the document and include tool versioning information.
More like this:
~~~
.\" Man page generated from reStructuredText by rst2man
.\" from docutils 0.21rc1.
~~~
---
Sent from sourceforge.net because doc...@li... is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/docutils/bugs/
To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/docutils/admin/bugs/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list. |
