In June 2011 I did some work for including license information in a docbook article.
There were no comments, indicating that the need was limited.
Is there a better way to do this ?
legalnotice is one way, but for "standard" licenses there could be an easier way.
Maybe the suggested attributes belong to legalnotice instead of a new tag.
Or is "standard" formatting for "standard" licenses out of the scope of docbook ?
I did an attempt to use legalnotice in 2007 but it was not very successful.
Perhaps a document with the normal creative commons look is just not feasible.
I could try to improve the proposal if there is any interest, and if I get any indication to what needs to be changed.
Log in to post a comment.