[ docbook-Bugs-1236899 ] FO: missing start-indent attribute in TOC level 1 entries

[SourceForge.net <no...@so...>]

Bugs item #1236899, was opened at 2005-07-12 11:44
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bobstayton
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=373747&aid=1236899&group_id=21935

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: XSL
Group: output: print/FO/PDF
>Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Martin Gieseking (mgieseki)
Assigned to: Robert Stayton (bobstayton)
Summary: FO: missing start-indent attribute in TOC level 1 entries

Initial Comment:
The indentation width of first level entries of the
automatically generated TOC are not described properly.
After rendering the fo file with FOP or XEP they get
the same indent width as level 2 entries. 
I think the reason for this is the missing start-indent
attribute of the corresponding fo:block element
(id="toc...idFOO"). When setting it to "0pt" everything
seems to be ok.

Martin

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Robert Stayton (bobstayton)
Date: 2006-02-09 12:00

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=193218

This is an issue only when using FOP 0.20.5 and 
fop.extensions is not set to 1, which is not recommended.  
See:

http://www.sagehill.net/docbookxsl/InstallingAnFO.html#Usin
gFop

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jag (jagstah)
Date: 2006-01-02 01:54

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=1042041

I will create a new bug report so that I may upload a 
picture of the TOC, which was generated using the standard 
docbook.xsl stylesheet in 1.69.1.

Basically the chapters are indented (when they should not 
be) and the sect2 elements are not indented (when they 
should be).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Robert Stayton (bobstayton)
Date: 2005-12-27 22:46

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=193218

I don't see the problem.  Can you provide more details?  
Do you mean that section level 1 entries have the same 
indent as section level 2 entries?  Is this in a book 
table of contents, or is it an article table of contents?  
Are you setting any stylesheet parameters when you process 
the files, such as body.start.indent or title.margin.left, 
and fop.extensions or xep.extensions?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jag (jagstah)
Date: 2005-12-21 09:46

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=1042041

By the way, how do I attach a file? I have a screenshot you 
should look at...

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jag (jagstah)
Date: 2005-12-21 09:43

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=1042041

I too have this problem with 1.69.1 !!! If I set the 
draft.mode param to 'yes' the toc is just fine.

What is the fix for this? I haven't been able to figure it 
out myself or by looking around here.

Kevin

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Robert Stayton (bobstayton)
Date: 2005-09-24 15:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=193218

I believe the indent problems in the TOC were fixed in version 
1.69.1.  Can you test with that version and confirm that the 
problem is either still there or fixed for your files?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Martin Gieseking (mgieseki)
Date: 2005-07-12 13:08

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=138565

I've just recognized that the problem seems to be more
complicated. The left and right TOC margins differ from the
section's body margins.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=373747&aid=1236899&group_id=21935