|
From: Seiji A. <sei...@hd...> - 2012-12-20 15:02:24
|
>Though it seems most of patch2 should have been in patch1 (except for the efi part). OK. I will merge pstore part in patch2 to patch1. > > The only nitpick I have is the name 'is_non_blocking_path'. I don't know why, but the name doesn't seem exactly right to me. I was > thinking something like 'pstore_cannot_block_path' or something. But it is just a nitpick, so it doesn't matter either way to me. I will rename the function in next patch. Seiji |