|
From: Thomas G. <tg...@li...> - 2012-07-13 19:20:45
|
On Fri, 13 Jul 2012, Seiji Aguchi wrote: > > Those x86 specific ones are not really frequently raised vectors, > > so enabling them all won't affect performance and readability of > > the traces too much. > > OK. I will unify these to a single tracepoint. > "x86_irq_vector" or so? I'd rather see a real generic one, which can be used by other architectures for their esoteric non common vectors as well. Something like misc_vector_entry/exit. Any better name is welcome :) Thanks, tglx |