|
From: Roland M. <ro...@re...> - 2009-11-18 21:19:02
|
> Roland McGrath wrote: > > I would add the siginfo_t * argument to each of these tracepoints. > > I see. Is it OK to record only si_errno and si_code? because si_signo > might be as same as sig. Yes, si_signo will match sig. Which siginfo_t fields are interesting to record can vary by signal (i.e. by si_code). si_code and si_errno are certainly the first things that come to mind as most useful. For SI_TIMER, si_tid, si_overrun, and si_sigval are interesting. For others, si_pid and si_uid are interesting. Thanks, Roland |