|
From: Masami H. <mhi...@re...> - 2009-10-05 21:31:05
|
Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 05:11:05PM -0400, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: >> Frederic Weisbecker wrote: >>> Hmm, the problem is that %1, %2, etc. is not very self-explainable. >>> >>> May be %arg1, %arg2, etc.. But would that sound confusing since we >>> have % for registers? >> >> As I sent right now, how about %argumentN ? it will not conflict with >> register names... >> > > There are archs that have %arg0 %arg1, ... as register names? > > Well, arg(n) looks shorter but I won't personnally mind if > we eventually chose %argumentN. It's also clear, self-explainable > and it won't collide. Hmm, one idea hits me, how about this? :) - %register - %%spvars (%%retval, %%arg0) Thank you, -- Masami Hiramatsu Software Engineer Hitachi Computer Products (America), Inc. Software Solutions Division e-mail: mhi...@re... |