Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] Command line vs. configuration file

[Tony E. <to...@he...>]

Murray S. Kucherawy wrote, on 07. mar 2007 20:07:

> As you've hopefully noticed by now, the command line argument list for 
> dkim-milter has gotten pretty dense.  In response, I've added a 
> configuration file option and as of v0.6.1 most or all of the things you 
> can do on the command line are also available through the configuration 
> file.
> 
> What are people's preferences?  Do you prefer one or the other?
> 
> Any future options will probably only be added to the configuration file 
> so as to limit command line clutter.  I might also begin removing things 
> from the command line other than the really important stuff.  Would that 
> really upset anyone?

Have read all the posts in this thread and I'm sure all will be 
rejoicing ...

Bit of background and a question:

Background: My sites use Postfix 2.3 with a subset (that's how I'd name 
it) of Sendmail milter support, all use Red Hat RHAS4 and everything but 
everything that gets installed on them is via rpms. Good, there are no 
dkim-milter rpms, so I write my own specs, including patching 
dkim-filter for Postfix and RHAS4 (Linux FHS - Filesystem Hierarchy 
Standard).

Question: I've been ignorantly coasting along on dkim-filter 0.5.2, 
unaware of the development work going on. Now I see this post and want 
0.6.1. I download it and have to configure dkim-filter/Makefile.m4. 
There is a welter of new "dnl Compile time options, especially FFRs". I 
don't find anything in any README or anything else about them. What do 
they do, and which would I need?

Thanks and best,

--Tonni

-- 
Tony Earnshaw
Email: tonni at hetnet dot nl