From: Murray S. K. <ms...@se...> - 2008-01-31 21:34:06
|
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, Mark Martinec wrote: > Any plans to use EDNS0 queries? My understanding is that that's entirely transparent to me behind the resolver, so libdkim doesn't have to worry about it. libar might though. I'll review that part of it. > Just for fun, I added two more messages to yesterday's test message > (attached), using the 3k bit and 4k bit keys. The Mail::DKIM validates > all 6 signatures just fine. With my patches to libdkim, all six signatures verify. However, when using libar, the first two key queries (the two new ones) come back with an answer count of zero and a short reply. Could be a limitation in my libar code. I'll check it out. |