q= needs more robust validation

Brought to you by: gshapiro, rrognlie

#75 q= needs more robust validation

Milestone: v2.3.2

Status: closed-fixed

Owner:

Labels: Functionality (106)

Priority: 5

Updated: 2007-11-30

Created: 2007-10-25

Creator:

Private: No

If a message arrives with a signature containing "q=blah:dns", the "blah" should be ignored but "dns" should still be processed.

Discussion

Anonymous - 2007-10-29

Logged In: YES
user_id=1048957
Originator: YES

Try the attached patch.
File Added: PATCH

If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Anonymous - 2007-10-29

Proposed patch #1

PATCH

If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Anonymous - 2007-11-30

Logged In: YES
user_id=1048957
Originator: YES

v2.4.0 released, containing this fix.

If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Anonymous - 2007-11-30

status: open --> closed-fixed
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Log in to post a comment.