Re: Follow-up to DK Status: bad errors.

[T. S. <big...@gm...>]

DKIM Test: not available
DomainKeys Test: neutral
DomainKeys Policy: "t=3Dy; o=3D-; n=3Dnotes; r=3Dpostmaster@texas-shooters.=
com"
DKIM Sender Signing Policy: "t=3Dy; o=3D-; n=3Dnotes;
r=3Dp...@te..."

Well, at least it's not bad this time. So does neutral =3D=3D passed?



On 2/4/06, T. Shoes <big...@gm...> wrote:
> Awesome! I'll give it a shot.
>
> On 2/4/06, SM <sm...@re...> wrote:
> > Hi Tommy,
> > At 07:46 04-02-2006, T. Shoes wrote:
> > >Sure. Is that as simple as adding a c=3Dnofws to the TXT record for th=
e
> > >signing entry in DNS?
> >
> > You do not have to modify the TXT record in DNS.  The
> > canonicalization settings are set when you start dk-milter.
> >
> > For example:
> >
> > /usr/bin/dk-filter -l -p inet:8891@localhost -c nofws -d example.com
> > -s /var/db/domainkeys/mail.key.pem -S mail -u domainkeys -m MSA
> >
> > There is a list of autoresponders at
> > http://www.elandsys.com/resources/sendmail/domainkeys.html which you
> > can use to test DomainKeys.
> >
> > Regards,
> > -sm
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log =
files
> > for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
> > searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
> > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D103432&bid=3D230486&dat=
=3D121642
> > _______________________________________________
> > dk-milter-discuss mailing list
> > dk-...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dk-milter-discuss
> >
>
>
> --
> There is no "I" in team, but there is "Iran" in "Uranium"..
>


--
There is no "I" in team, but there is "Iran" in "Uranium"..