Re: [Devil-linux-develop] [0.6Beta1] New release, 4 new problems!

[Heiko Z. <he...@zu...>]

Dean Nedelman wrote:
>>On 08/27/2003 03:25:14 AM "Dean Nedelman" wrote:
>>
>>>Heiko Zuerker wrote:
>>>
>>>>Dean Nedelman wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>still getting a grsec error:
>>>>>grsec: attempted resource overstep by requesting 92786688 for
>>
>>RLIMIT_STACK
>>
>>>>>against limit 8388608 by (pidof:385) UID(0) EUID(0), parent
>>
>>(S05network:373)
>>
>>>>>UID(0) EUID(0)
>>>>>
>>>>>I -believe- this is related to my dhcpcd.exe script - which uses
>>
>>pidof.
>>
>>>>That is really strange.
>>>>Can you try it with a "clean" setup? I mean empty floppy and
>>
>>configuring
>>
>>>>the stuff via the setup program.
>>>>How much RAM do you have in this machine?
>>>
>>>I have 64MB of ram.
>>
>>Then this can't be the root of the problem.
> 
> 
> Ok, same problem.  I get that grsec message when the default dhcpcd.exe is
> executed.
> 
> I started with a clean setup, ran setup and set the following items:
>   o Hostname
>   o Domain name
>   o Timezone
>   o ETH0 module
>   o ETH0 gets its IP address dynamically
>   o ETH1 module
>   o ETH1's static IP address
>   o Use Bruce's 2NIC firewall
> 
> Rebooted, got the error.

I did the same and can't reproduce your error, sorry.
Does anybody else experiences a problem like this?

> Couple of observations (for what its worth):
> 
>  - Firewall.rules.2nic has a bug: it has a hard coded reference to /bin/echo
>  - the "Setting up ROLF/F" message that I get on the console, showed up
> instead on the SYSLOG output (F10) when I used the above mentioned setup.
The ROL/F patch is removed and won't cause any further problems.

>  - The setup program didn't set the interface modules correctly, but that
> may have been "operator error" (it is possible I may have scrolled down but
> not hit "OK" or something like that).

Work fine for me, so it looks like an operator error.

cya
   Heiko