|
From: Dean N. <di...@ti...> - 2003-08-04 22:37:34
|
>>On 08/04/2003 05:02:37 PM Manu wrote: >>>Heiko Zuerker a =E9crit: >>> >>>Hey guys, >>> >>>I successfully intregrated the GCC stack smashing protector into DL ! >>>For more information about this >>piece:http://www.research.ibm.com/trl/projects/security/ssp >>> >> >>Great feature it is; now, if I understand well, one have to enable >>fstack-protector in each compile script and see if it works well ?? > >Not really. It's enabled by default and you have to disable it for each >application which doesn't work anymore. ;-) >I had to do this for the kernel (build/scripts/linux) and some other >modules, but there can still be some apps out there which have problems >once you try to run them. > >Heiko ...i think i better stock up on CD's, because I sense that this is going = to take a few builds... :-) Seriously, I thought that the PAX part of GRSecurity did this. Do we now have TWO stack smashing protectors, or was the PAX one disabled? Dean Nedelman TimeLord Consulting |