Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] No FreeSWAN in next DL? (was: Why so many Kernel builds?)

[Bruce S. <bw...@ar...>]

> I had to make _small_ changes to ipsec.conf:
> http://www.freeswan.org/freeswan_trees/freeswan-2.01/doc/upgrading.html
> 
> In all, I do not see why one shouldn't upgrade to Freeswan 2.x. The
> changes required are minimal. Other packages, which require modification
> of the config files, are upgraded too, right?

I'm not a IPSEC user, but someone might want/need opportunistic
encryption.

Heck, I'll all for including the latest releases of everything in the
new DL.  If it was up to me, I'd upgrade to kernel-2.6-testX.  :-)
(probably a good thing it's not up to me ;)

 - BS