|
From: Emmanuel E. <ee...@fr...> - 2003-03-12 16:05:53
|
Heiko Zuerker a écrit: >On 03/12/2003 12:27:12 AM Heiko Zuerker wrote: > > >>Heiko Zuerker wrote: >> >> >>>Manu ESCAR wrote: >>> >>> >>>>>>so i opened another shell to see it was grsec patches ! Amazing as >>>>>>the option was disabled for a while in my selection! So i edit >>>>>>.config file to see that there is no ligne with >>>>>> >>>>>> >>CONFIG_GRSECURITY=n !!! >> >> >>>>>It's important that there is no CONFIG_GRSECURITY=y . >>>>>I checked the script again, I can't find any problems. >>>>>Do you know if CONFIG_XFS and CONFIG_GRSECURITY were set to "y" ? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>CONFIG_XFS=y and nothing about CONFIG_GRSECURITY, not even >>>>CONFIG_GRSECURITY=n >>>> >>>> >>>Strange, I'll start a compile with xfs and no grsec >>> >>> >>Ok the first compile with xfs and no grsec failed. >>I updated xfs and the tools for it and started a recompile. >>6 1/2 hours left until I have to get up, so time to go in direction bed. >> >> > >It failed again. >The problem is not grsec, it's the xfs patch which fails to apply. >So just unselect xfs and your compile should work. > >XFS is anyway not supported at the moment, because it doesn't work well >with grsec. >When somebody want's to fix the problem now, I'm more then happy to throw >it into CVS. > >cya > Heiko > Thank you, i ,was going mad some more ;-) > > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! >Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and >the chance of winning an Apple iPod: >http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en >_______________________________________________ >Devil-linux-develop mailing list >Dev...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop > > > > |