|
From: Friedrich L. <fl...@fl...> - 2002-04-05 01:33:56
|
Heiko Zuerker wrote: > > > I'd like to check in my modifications, but I don't know the motivations > > behind why klogd wasn't started before. > > When you specify debug (7) as loglevel, then you don't have any problems. So why not klogd? Not only messages to the console would get suppressed, also oopses would get decoded if we'd run klogd. See http://www.balabit.hu/static/syslog-ng/reference/reference.html Example 3-5. Using the file() driver .... NOTE: on Linux, the klogd daemon reads kernel messages, and forwards them to the syslogd process. klogd preprocesses kernel messages and replaces addresses with symbolic names (from /boot/System.map). If you don't want to lose this functionality you'll have to run klogd with syslog-ng as well. -- MfG / Regards Friedrich Lobenstock |