|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2002-03-13 20:06:45
|
Hi, The following message was sent by "John van V." <joh...@ya...> on Wed, 13 Mar 2002 11:37:10 -0800 (PST). > I want to reflect the following (very constructive) comments. My guys > like > Debian, and after showing them some problems in the LFS written init.d/network > script they really balked. Personally, I always liked /etc/rc.local... > but > thats a personal preferance. They want to go w/ a Debian stucture which > I > imagine follows offical linux standards. I have been working on Solaris > and > HPUX recently. I don't have any Debian knowledge, but when it's good what you do and we like it, why not change it? > They so much love the CD-only solution that I had to show them your > self-imposed bug reporting about harddrive access. They then suggested > we > search for a VFAT MSDOS disk as well where we could set up a DL/LSD file > system > including swap space. We got a giggle when the perl install crashed the > box > for lack of memory. This will change in the Beta6. Harddisk support (log, swap, samba,...) is running. DL itself doesn't run anymore in a Ramdisk, we switched to SHMFS (uses, if neccessary, swapspace). > Also, they dont like ISO Boot (by reputuation) and the society already > committed to Grub. My booting problem, that you fixed wasnt really broken. > DL > was trying to boot from the CDWriter, hdc not the Fast CDreader, hdd. Needs some improvements. ;-) > Do you > think this is an ISO boot problem. Can Grub work on a CD ?? I don't know group. We had Lilo before, but SYSLINUX/ISOLINUX seems to work much better. > I will start working on TO-DO so that we can we can refresh your CVS with > our > modifications. Would be great. > Ethernet card detection is very high on the list, for obvious reasons. > Once we > get that, then the rest of the distributed install is a cakewalk. If you think so. ;-) > > Thanks again for all your efforts, You're welcome. cu Heiko |