|
From: Friedrich L. <fl...@fl...> - 2002-02-24 16:48:00
|
Heiko Zuerker wrote: > > Gunther Stammwitz wrote: > > >first of all: I like the idea of donations very much. People CAN pay but > >they aren't forced to. (Paypal would be fine since it's easy to use and > >fast. A server in a 1U-design for example doesn't cost more than 600 ?uros) > > > Gunther you should know this: when a company gives a donation, do they > need any receipts? IMO yes they will need receipts. > I think for this, we would have to create a organization, to be legal. As a direct conclusion from above, yes! > >Before we think about changeing the license we have to think about one > >important question: who owns the devil-linux code. A lot of people have > >contributed code to the devil-linux community. If we change the license and > >charge any fees we'll have to ask everyone for his permission, right ? > >I remember that sourceforge did the same when they changed the license. > > > Right. Changing the license is currently the last option for me. > > >We have to make sure that devillinux will be available for free to every > >private user. > > > That's for sure and will never change. > > >The idea of a enterprise-license for companies is not bad. > > > The goal is not to make a lot of money (but would be nice), it's more to > support the project. > > >What about additional alternative models of makeing money: selling support, > >selling the development of specific modules and consulting and so... > > > I was also thinking about this: selling CDs, selling firewall rules, .... > We can also append the following to the license: when people earn money > with Devil-Linux (any type of services), they have to donate 10%. The big problem for free projects, who will pay the bill for server, internet connection, ..... will donations help or do we need to get commercial? -- MfG / Regards Friedrich Lobenstock |