Re: [Devil-linux-develop] kernel

[Heiko Z. <he...@zu...>]

Hey,

the 2.6.32.x serious was declared the long term stable and only bug  
fixes are added. Newer kernel have newer code, which of course "could"  
introduce bugs.

Heiko

Quoting Bruce Smith <bw...@re...>:

> I like the latest and greatest.  At least close to the latest and greatest
> as possible.
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by impact on stability.  Is the latest kernel
> more or less stable?
>
>  - BS
>
>
> On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 17:56, Heiko Zuerker <he...@zu...> wrote:
>
>> Hey,
>>
>> I'm contemplating if we should switch back to the latest and greatest
>> kernel again. This may have some impact on stability and of course
>> we'll sometimes have to wait for a patch to come out.
>>
>> The benefit would be having the latest and greatest drivers available.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> --
>>
>> Regards
>>   Heiko Zuerker
>>   http://www.devil-linux.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> What Every C/C++ and Fortran developer Should Know!
>> Read this article and learn how Intel has extended the reach of its
>> next-generation tools to help Windows* and Linux* C/C++ and Fortran
>> developers boost performance applications - including clusters.
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay
>> _______________________________________________
>> Devil-linux-develop mailing list
>> Dev...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop
>>


-- 

Regards
   Heiko Zuerker
   http://www.devil-linux.org