Re: [Devil-linux-develop] [Devil-Linux-discuss] DL configuration/Unionfs

[Bruce S. <br...@ar...>]

> > I don't know what the difference is. Aufs is not in DL right now.
> > If aufs is really more stable and maybe better maintained, then we  
> > should go for that one.
> 
> I don't know either.  The aufs people understandably advocate their offering 
> enthusiastically. See below.

I haven't tried aufs, but it appears to function similar to unionfs?

If so, here is my plan (feel free to shoot holes in it):

Since UnionFS is already working in DL, I want to first get this working
with unionfs and prove the concept that it will function as planned.

Once we've proved it works with UnionFS, we can [try to] add aufs to DL.
Since they function similar then it should be easy to switch between
UnionFS and aufs.  Right???  

Maybe we could make a menuconfig option to select which FS to use.

 - BS