|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2005-11-24 01:28:03
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, November 23, 2005 07:21, jj-ml wrote: > Vesselin wrote: > > >> So the process is: >> 1. The netfilter team submits patches for the 2.6 kernel >> 2. As the patches are accepted they are dropped from patch-o-matic >> 3. As they are not in patch-o-matic they are not applied to the 2.4 >> kernel 4. We are screwed >> > >> I really do not know what the solution should be. Hand-picking old >> patches > would be painfull. However, if >not done, the functionality of iptables > would gradually erode... > > > Thanks a lot for that quick response.. > It explains a lot of bad things :). Yeah this really sucks. I don't understand why they do something like this... - -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDhRcEUcytMSbs+YURAucvAKCAIiuM3aX2ej7fgA2vLT0aow4AtwCghHDO VwqdQKCzQCbvrQ9wygCxgn8= =X9hl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |