Re: Re[6]: [Devil-linux-develop] RTOS patch for DL

[Heiko Z. <he...@zu...>]

On Wed, August 24, 2005 06:48, Serge Leschinsky wrote:
> Dear Heiko,
>
>
> Friday, July 29, 2005, 7:18:38 PM, you wrote:
>
>>> I'm sorry, but I don't check rtos patches with grsec because I don't
>>> use grsec in my servers. I check that pax patch has a several rejects
>>> after rtos apply. If it's interesting for anybody I'll try to apply
>>> rtos and grsec simultaneously. Theoretically, there is no reason for
>>> any incompatibles in these patches.
>
>> Yes please try if they work together.
>> Otherwise you'll have to add some logic into the menuconfig part, so you
>>  can't select rtos together with grsec (which is very easy).
> I'm sorry again for so long term of answer writing. There are some
> troubles happened. So, abt grsec. I haven't done it because grsec patch
> trys to modify sched.c file which was completely rewritten by rtos patch.
> Now, I've got a
> little changed grsec patch which produces rejects into 2 files: the first -
> in Makefile (in version string) - it's easy the second - 4 rejects in
> sched.c file. It's a seriously....
>
> If anybody is interested into modified patch I'll send it directly
> because of its size...

It doesn't make sense to maintain a modified grsec patch just for rtos.
I would suggest to make rtos only available on systems, which have grsec
disabled.

-- 

Regards
  Heiko Zuerker
  http://www.devil-linux.org