|
From: Serge L. <se...@nn...> - 2005-07-27 16:39:54
|
Dear Sirs, Saturday, July 23, 2005, 1:35:54 PM, you wrote: SL> it. Unfortunately vhz patch and performance patch are incompatible SL> now. I've forgotten to say I applied this performance patch without PAX and grsecurity. I've tested my system by SysBench (system performance benchmark, http://sysbench.sourceforge.net/) with performance patch and without it. ># ./sysbench --num-threads=500 --max-requests=10000 --test=threads run >sysbench v0.4.0: multi-threaded system evaluation benchmark > >Running the test with following options: >Number of threads: 500 > >Doing thread subsystem performance test >Thread yields per test: 1000 Locks used: 8 >Threads started! >Done. Without Perf patch | With Perf patch | >Test execution summary: | > total time: 236.9318s | 359.9786s > total number of events: 10000 | 10000 > total time taken by | > event execution: 113411.5786 | 179826.3306 > per-request statistics: | > min: 0.0010s | 13.8871s > avg: 11.3412s | 17.9826s > max: 93.7898s | 21.2820s > approx. 95 percentile: 61.2178s | 18.1917s > | >Threads fairness: | > distributin: 45.45/79.44 | 100.00/100.00 > execution: 42.06/78.00 | 99.62/99.93 The most interesting result is "approx. 95 percentile:", i.e. the most evident time of thread execute. -- Best regards, Serge mailto:se...@nn... |